Para leer la versión en español, haz clic aqui.
To review, here is what classes would look like in 2016-2017, assuming that no one leaves during the summer and the attrition rate is 0%.
| 6th graders | 5th graders | 4th graders | 3rd graders | Class Size | |
| 5/6 combo | 28 | 5 | 33 | ||
| 5th | 33 | 33 | |||
| 4/5 combo | 3 | 30 | 33 | ||
| 3/4 combo | 14 | 10 | 24 | ||
| 3rd | 24 | 24 | |||
| 2/3 combo??? | 11 | ??? | |||
| Total | 28 | 41 | 44 | 45 | 147 |
As you can see, the bottleneck forces combination classes throughout the program. Without raising class sizes in grades K-3 above 24 students, there would not be enough spaces for the students currently in the program.
Even when you adjust the table for students that leave the program (families moving outside of the district or choosing charter schools), a minimum of 14 students would have to leave in order to relieve the pressure. Class sizes would STILL be at the absolute maximum of 33 students in grades 4-6. The program is literally busting at the seams.
One
solution is to add an FTE (Full Time Employee, meaning a teacher) to relieve the pressure building up in the
bottleneck. There would still be a combination class, but only one. Here is what classes would look like:
| 2016-2017 | 6th graders | 5th graders | 4th graders | Class Size |
| 6th | 28 | 28 | ||
| 5th | 28 | 28 | ||
| 4/5 combo | 13 | 13 | 26 | |
| 4th | 31 | 31 | ||
| Total | 28 | 41 | 44 | 113 |
Class sizes are smaller, but not too small. If necessary, other Spanish-speaking students could be recruited to enter the program in order to boost class sizes.
What is the disadvantage to this solution? There is still a combination class, but students would not have to experience CONSECUTIVE COMBINATION CLASSES as they do now. There is obviously an additional financial expense with the additional teacher.
Are there other solutions? Always! Click here to see Bottleneck Solution #2.
No comments:
Post a Comment